Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer architecture and organisation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\^talk 11:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Computer architecture and organisation

Computer architecture and organisation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not an encyclopedic article at all. I would speedy it but can't find one that quite fit the bill. Perhaps a snowball delete will get rid of it speedily. Malcolmxl5 16:27, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Because ... um ...just look at it folks. This is someone's lecture notes outline, not an article. and the title is so random it doesn need a redirect or anything. Like nom, I can't think the basis to speedy, but perhaps after a few comments we can speedy close.Obina 16:37, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Not sure this was intended as an article or just a place to post his lecture notes. In any case it actually asserts copyright so I'll put up a speedy on that basis. --Dhartung | Talk 16:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: As to the copyright: the article was originally created by User:Ratheeshs2004, and was later edited by him. The email address given in the page is ratheeshs2004@yahoo.co.in, so I assume this means that the original creator posted his own data. Having said all of that, though, the article is entirely off-topic, and seems to be just the first page of a syllabus. Besides, there are already articles on computer architecture and computer organization. — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 17:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This is part of a syllabus for a course at some university, not an encyclopedia article. --Metropolitan90 17:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- as per Metropolitan, not encyclopedic. The rest of the syllabus might make it so, but it's not here...--SarekOfVulcan 15:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.