The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 01:16, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Everything about this article smacks of a copyvio but I can't find any text anywhere to prove it. Then again, based on the article's tagline it could be original research. I'm going to list it here and let the community decide what to do with it. James084 23:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete. No context. -- Krash (Talk) 00:01, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete. bordering on unintelligible. appears to have no content. pschemp | talk 07:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete per Pschemp. Stifle 11:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.