Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complex sales

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:08, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Complex sales

seems to be some sort of obscure dicdef...? Or neologism? Master Thief Garrett 02:45, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete It is covered in as much detail in sales. Anilocra 08:56, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, now a better article has been identified... or Merge (w/ sales if cites etc. are added. Master Thief Garrett 10:14, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Potential for expansion. TigerShark 21:27, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I posted this entry because it is a phrase that is commonly used to search on my business website, so others are looking for definitions of it. It is well documented in the business press, and I was planning to add cites later this week. If it gets taken down, I guess you'll save me the trouble of posting cites. Laura Ricci
  • nonono, we allow and indeed encourage users to add to articles while they are up for Vfd!--indeed the changes may sway voters to change their votes. While we fully encourage expansion, perhaps this information you are providing could be covered under sales as a subsection? This page would then become a redirect to there, and people could find information about all types of sales, not just this, all in one categorised place. Master Thief Garrett 10:14, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• keep and hope for speedy citing of sources. Kappa 05:36, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into context at sales, and add the cites there. Radiant_* 09:16, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge is fine with me. Do I do this, or does someone else make the changes? It seemed that Sales was getting too long, but I don't know what page length you like to use. Lricci Apr 28 2005

Today I find that 'Sales' is locked and recommended for disection into multiple pages. I'm a newbie, so I'll just check back later to see what the decision is about this page. Lricci 17:05, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.