Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparative statistics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comparative statistics

prod by Grenavitar (unsourced, doesn't show it has a basis) removed, so bringing it to Afd. The content is nonsense, but potential content is covered at Statistics and related articles. Eusebeus 11:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nom. There may be a case for a good article on comparative statistics, if required as an offshoot of Statistics, but this article doesn't satisfy that requirement on any level.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  12:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nom. Seems superfluous. PJM 13:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete without prejudice. There's a potential article if Statistics becomes large enough, but there's nothing here to merge into Statistics. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Arthur Rubin. Septentrionalis 04:23, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --C S (Talk) 10:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep, bad faith nomination. Eusebeus is systematically bringing disputed prods to AfD without regard to merits of dispute. Monicasdude 14:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Disputed prod's should be brought to AfD, if the prod was in good faith. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment I see this discussion is already occuring on Eusebeus's and Monicasdude's talk pages, RFC's and other assorted places. I will further add that in this AfD, Eusebeus brought forth a different justification than the prod'er, even though that justfication is adquate. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:56, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.