Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compaq Presario MV500
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Compaq Presario MV500
Why would this computer monitor pass WP:PRODUCT? PROD was contested without comment. B. Wolterding (talk) 21:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: I cannot seem to find the model MV500 anywhere, Could be a hoax. Dwilso 21:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: That is odd. I just did a search in yahoo and immidiately found ones for sale on Craig's List and E-Bay among several other web hits.Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 00:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, doesn't matter how many are on sale at Craig's List and e-Bay. Fails WP:PRODUCT. +Hexagon1 (t) 01:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per Hexagon1. Stifle (talk) 14:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Merge This is a real product and under WP:PRODUCT such information belongs on the company's website that creates the product.Divinediscourse (talk) 18:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that it belongs on the company's website - but not in the company's Wikipedia article. Compaq has certainly produced thousands of similar products - but it's not the goal of Wikipedia to duplicate their product catalogue. Even the notability of the product series, Compaq Presario, seems unclear at this time. --B. Wolterding (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - It's a real product, but a non-notable one. It's listed in the Compaq Presario article, if someone wants to add a few details there. Fails WP:N and WP:PRODUCT as a standalone article. — Becksguy (talk) 22:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. As noted above, existence and notability are seperate questions, and despite existing, it is still a non-notable product. Pastordavid (talk) 20:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
