Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compact area group approach (CAGA)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
{{subst:Afd top}} {{subst:#if: | {{subst:#switch: {{{1}}} | d = delete. | k = keep. | nc = no consensus to delete, default to keep. | m = merge. | r = redirect. | {{{1}}} }}}} {{subst:#if: | {{{2}}} }} Keep. A disasterously badly written article in drastic need of cleanup, but no consensus to delete (I don't know what Delete and rewrite is supposed to mean) even after a relist. If you wanted it deleted, you had your chance to speak up and didn't, so it stays. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Compact area group approach (CAGA)
A movement in Indian farming. Rather spammy article and no evidence of notability. Also WP:CRYSTAL seems to apply. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:22, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I've added some sources. There's nothing crystally about this - the article in The Hindu is from two years ago and describes this approach as already in use. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and rewrite. The article as it exists reads an awful lot like it was transcribed from a Microsoft Powerpoint presentation - which unto itself doesn't mean it's bad, it is just that it's impossible to just transcribe from a .ppt and expect it to be encyclopedic. As it stands, it should be removed and rethought. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
