Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Middle School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Community Middle School

School vanity page with no alumns of any note whatsoever. EntropyGuardian 16:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: EntropyGuardian (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.

• Keep how is it vanity? It's written in a neutral tone all the way through. I suggest, however, that it gets some sources/references. --Alex (Talk) 21:41, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The science olympiad accomplishments are enough to pass WP:SCHOOL criteria #3. --- RockMFR 21:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per RockMFR, the article is quite decent as it stands. Yamaguchi先生 11:00, 15 October 2006
• Delete non notable school. Knowing Is Half The Battle 20:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, school with 1000+ students. bbx 21:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Alex, Yamaguchi, bbx. --Myles Long 23:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep Vanity!?!?!? This is a well-constructed, thoroughly-researched article for a school that has an explicit claim of notability in a Science Olympiad championship. Why on earth does a notable alumnus having attended a middle school -- let alone virtually any school, at any level -- make the school notable? And why does the absence of such a notable make the entire contents not even worth merging into a district article? All the more disturbing coming in the third edit ever from the nominator. Alansohn 02:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• keep please this is a good article about a notable school Yuckfoo 20:50, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per the above, the accomplishments section of the article establishes notability, sockpuppet nomination, etc. RFerreira 00:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep same reasons as above. --Vsion 04:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, pointless nomination considering the votes Schoolwatch can turn out --ForbiddenWord 14:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Let me just say that what is important is the consensus among all Wikipedians, not among schoolwatch this is a very alarming statement and not at all in the spirt of wikipedia goals. I visted the link to Schoolwatch and found no discussion as to what are notable or what is not. All I found were a list of AfD's current and a past AfD's with results totaled by month list with totals by month. As to its point of view I found this statement right at top of page "the terms 'keep' and 'no consensus' are used interchangeably (as no consensus defaults to keep)." TheRanger 16:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per above, please do not feed the trolls. Silensor 17:21, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, lacking notability. Some sentences may be mergeable to Science Olympiad. —ptk✰fgs 20:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.