Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Education Development Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (o rly?) 22:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Community Education Development Association

Community Education Development Association (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This organization was founded by a fellow who has twice tried to put his autobiography here, and is probably listing his organization for non-neutral motives. It turns up only 400 Google hits, nothing from any major press source, and the organization's website is extremely vague about what exactly it intends to do. YechielMan 06:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

  • I'm gonna go Weak Keep on the basis of WP:BITE. This entry seems valid and expandable.--ZayZayEM 07:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for failing to be attributable to a reliable source. Apart from directory listings no one seems to have written about the association. They fail the primary criterion of notability here - Peripitus (Talk) 10:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete although we shouldn't WP:BITE anybody, I have a hard time even finding their website. I think its unverifiable and still not notable until maybe one ounce of press coverage can be found (Standford's newspaper have anything relevant? Probably not...) Kopf1988 22:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no assertion of notability, no primary sources, can't be verified. Realkyhick 23:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Because it is an NGO in a third world country and is registered as such in the country in question. The fact that it does work with the various Ministries in the country as well as UN Organizations means that it is a valid entity even though it might not appear as frequently on the web. MaldivesPresident1:13, 19 March 2007
Comment The fact that its an NGO isnt disputed I suppose. There is the question of notablity, neutrality and its encyclopedi-ness. --Oblivious 05:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.