Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist Party of Peru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep and move to Communism in Peru. —Cleared as filed. 05:12, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Communist Party of Peru

The article is a hybrid miss-match. It does not deal with parties having the name PCdelP, but rather the concept of being a communist party in that particular country. This doesn't match general usage of article naming at wikipedia. The article could possibly be renamed to "Communism in Peru" or "Communist parties in Peru". --Soman 18:51, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 03:43, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Looks reasonable in light of the many Communist parties in that country. Since the Shining Path is known internationally for violence and others may be nonviolent, it seems fair and NPOV to have a stub outlining the situation. Although I'm no specialist on the subject, the presentation meets Wikipedia standards. Durova 04:16, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Rename Communism in Peru with redirect, per nom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex bartho (talk • contribs)
• Weak keep per Durova. NSLE _{(讨论+extra)} 05:09, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep A disambiguation page would be required in any case, and it is better to have the added clarification. CalJW 06:06, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Rename as Communism in Peru with redirect, per Alex bartho. Enough content not to be deleted, anyhow. Squiddy 10:31, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Rename to Communism in Peru as per Alex. Andrew Levine 17:40, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Rename as recommended above. Jtmichcock 02:33, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.