Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common criticisms of Skandia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Skandia where this has been merged. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:48, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Common criticisms of Skandia

It is a POV fork of Skandia. There is plenty of room in that article for criticisms, and I feel very skeptical when criticisms of a company are moved to a separate article, without even a link in that article. Smacks of censorship. Delete. Makemi 23:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Merge into Skandia, ensuring the material is NPOV. There is no need for a separate page for this paragraph. -- Mithent 00:27, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge NPOV and verifiable text back to parent article and then delete. -- Krash (Talk) 01:14, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP is not place for a crusade. Pavel Vozenilek 02:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as POV inherent.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge back to Skandia. Stifle 23:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Pavel/Blnguyen. - Rudykog 11:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.