Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commercetel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Commercetel

Commercetel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Only claim to fame appears to be that they now do some work for NPR. Went through an uncontested speedy six days ago as CommerceTel but it appears to be back now. Also, while not strictly an argument for deletion, the sole contributor appears to have a conflict of interest [1] --Jaysweet (talk) 20:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete G11 as fairly blatant spam, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per TenPoundHammer. Mr Senseless (talk) 22:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Could make an argument for this being a G4 as well as a G11. Either way, kill it quick. Blueboy96 00:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

  Comment: It's not G4 if the previous deletion was speedy. That's a big part of why I started AfD in the first place, so that we get consensus and any other recreation attempts get an instant G4. --Jaysweet (talk) 16:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.