Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Combinatronic

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect. —Xezbeth 20:07, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Combinatronic

The article appears to be on a completely irrelevant topic (the corruption of a term), and has no content. This page should be deleted, and considered for redirect into combinatorics. Falcon 01:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect only. What an odd attempt at a dictdef. Geogre 02:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect -Snorre/Antwelm 07:07, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. It almost looks like a misspelling of combinatoric. hydnjo talk 18:40, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to combinatorics, and not combinatoric. Jitse Niesen 23:14, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Of course, Combinatorics. My error (avoids redirect). hydnjo talk 23:22, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - combinatorics is surely very well defined mathematical term. Redirect of "Combinatronic" would only polute the namespace of mathematics. Pavel Vozenilek 23:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.