Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Combatant (computer game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was "zOMG Delete!!1!1". - Mailer Diablo 17:53, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Combatant (computer game)

Delete: WP not a crystal ball. Given the users contributions (213.249.155.233 (talk · contribs)) likely a hoax. Wikibofh 15:12, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


  • Please don't delete per nomination. 17:10, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
"zOMG Keep!!1!1"
"zOMG Keep!!1!1"

(sorry im proably definatly doing this in the wrong way , I apologise I don't know the procedure, but I know the person who is programming it ., his name is Mark Hodghton and the article is not a hoax (he wrote it up at school for ICT and for form time and could do with it staying there) ,the game its self is very near to completion according to him , and everyone here is looking forward to seeing it . I've got a demo and everything he lists is there is there !

  1. You don't have a /sig so you should sign your comments to talk pages with the default ~~~~ instead of copying my sig format and timestamp.
  2. You have only two edits to date, and both of them are to this AFD page, thus your vote is unlikely to be given serious consideration.
  3. Having read your explanation, I'm changing my vote to "Delete – vanity"
— FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 16:49, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


I saw that game, it is real! It's a 2D shooter kinda like Worms in Real Time. Don't delete the article, this is real. Signed: Jarl_Frank


Please don't delete this - he has worked very hard designing the game

  • Delete I'm sorry, but how hard you friend has worked is irrelevant because the game is 1) not yet complete and 2) not notable. It might be appropriate to have an article if and when it becomes notable in the future but not before then. To Freakofnurture: play nice to the newbie and give them the benefit of the doubt. To the newbie: Please sign your posts with four ~s. See How to edit a page. Swegner 18:21, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete according to verifiability concerns and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. We are not a crystal ball and we do not have any verifiable information as to whether this game will be successful. Until we do, we cannot have an article. Best wishes on its success. Capitalistroadster 18:54, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete plus applause for the excellent sockpuppet graphic :-) Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 19:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete with a heart. This looks like a sincere effort by a couple of young people. It just isn't ready for an encyclopedia. Start a web page and post to game sites when it's ready. Best wishes to both of you. Durova 21:44, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Ok we submit, you can delete it, my friend says he will repost it once he has finished it and says thanks for the encouragement .

  • Delete, with delete feydey 00:41, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Applause for the sockpuppet graphic. Such is the joy of editing in Wikipedia. -- Perfecto Canada 02:57, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete If the game takes off at all (and good luck with it), it may become notable enough for an entry here. Wikipedia is not the place to publicise projects under development. --StoatBringer 15:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Yet to be released, nn. *drew 03:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.