Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Combat Submission Wrestling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 19:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Combat Submission Wrestling

Combat Submission Wrestling (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)
  • deleteThe founder of the system was recently deleted for being non-notable. Stands to reason what he founded would be the same. Peter Rehse 07:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 01:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • delete It appears that Paulson started a wrestling dojo and decided to market it as 'his unique blend of traditions from around the world'. People do this all the time. I found a couple of training/fitness DVDs, and minor references under ADCC (which appears to be the Olympics of submission wrestling), but nothing that would really cinche it as encyclopedic. If the style catches on I would say that it might become notable, but as it stands I vote not. Eldereft 01:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Appears totally non-notable, verging on self-promotion. --Haemo 02:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No evidence of notability. No sources. --Shirahadasha 02:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No assertion of notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete no assertion of notability. JCO312 17:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not much relevant info so it lacks a lot of notability. Tellyaddict 17:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Lacking sources which with this sort of article is quite essential, so hence any sort of possible notability can't be verified. Bungle44 17:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.