Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbian Red

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensusJForget 23:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Columbian Red

Columbian Red (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non notable marijuana strain. No assertion of notability, no sources. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 15:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

• Merge into a "Strain" section of the main article, same as other strains up for AfD. ◄Zahakiel► 21:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 22:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

• Graft to main stem, per Zahakiel --Victor falk 12:42, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - it really is a substub and needs more information, but like all taxa I think most, if not all, cultivars are notable. It just needs proper references. If anyone has a copy of this available, I'm sure it would be listed there. --Rkitko ^(talk) 13:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete (or merge) - given that this plant, as pretty much any cultivated plant, has hundreds to thousands of cultivars, most of which aren't particularly well-known or written about other than in brief entries in cultivar databases, it is much more practical to have a list of cannabis cultivars, a section in the main article, or even just a link to external sources. A few cultivars will warrant their own articles, but those should be written with sources and more than a single sentence, not mass-created in case they turn into real articles. (To give an idea of the scope, "There are more than 450,000 accessions (distinct varieties of plants) in the GRIN database." from [1] - and I'm sure other cultivar databases, or cultivars not listed in such databases, have many more). Kingdon 14:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete (or merge) - as stated above, there is no info on the page and since this is the second time this has come up and there still is nothing to the page, delete would be best. If there really is some info - it should be included, with other cultivars, on one page. 19:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardyplants (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.