The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep, nominator is actually nominating it to be kept. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 03:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Keep No references or Verifiability however that can be fixed. Notable but so is every other church in Australia I believe. If other churches can't have articles then it's a bit unfair that this one does.Nath85 1:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.