The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. By A7. →Bobby← 17:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Doesn't state it's importance, possible vanity. Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 17:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete I think this article should have been nominated for speedy delete. Kukini 17:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Speedy Delete A7 - and tagged as such. It could also qualify for having "little or no content". →Bobby← 17:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.