Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin R Nicholl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Colin R Nicholl

Non-notable academic Sam Clark 14:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per WP:BIO ST47 15:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Book published by a quite selective scholarly publisher, Cambridge University Press. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 16:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Since he is an assistant professor, it's unlikely that he is more notable than the average professor. See WP:PROFTEST. --Metropolitan90 16:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails to meet WP:BIO or WP:PROF. -AED 16:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment The book is part of a series of monographs. This sounds like the type a work an academe produces to meet his publication requirements. I can't see that it satisfies WP:PROF. :) Dlohcierekim 02:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. I could make almost exactly the same claim for notability - I've also got a book coming out in a monograph series from a selective academic publisher. So have a couple of my friends. But that doesn't make us notable, it just makes us ordinary junior academics. Cheers, Sam Clark 09:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Anyone who is driven to fillling up space by listing their academic qualifications really hasn't done much to change the world. I accept that we keep pretty much any institution that gives out degrees (although I have views on that), but it is too much to give every guy who sloped through a PhD and gets a cheque from a non-entity bible college their own Wikipedia article.Legis 16:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.