Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cognitive activism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete; as a side-note, Trebor is right about judging the article on its' merits rather than the nominator. Daniel.Bryant 09:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cognitive activism

Cognitive activism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

A7 Froody dog 19:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Neutral Article does assert notability and therefore does not meet A7. I don't really have no opinion so I won't vote at this time. Soltak | Talk 22:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep Vote changed as nom's only contribs relate to the nomination of this article. Soltak | Talk 22:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Judge the article on its merits, not its nominator. Trebor 23:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Article makes no notability claims, and doesn't actually provide any information. Link goes to website that does not appear to have anything to do with the article. Citicat 04:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Ad for Organelle; term neither used widely nor used this way elsewhere. Pomte 05:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, —Wknight94 (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no independent references The article's only reference appears to not be independent of the subject. Articles needs independent published references to verify the information is accurate and uses accepted terminology. Dugwiki 20:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless sourced; I haven't find anything relevant. Trebor 23:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless expanded beyond dicdef and sourced. delldot | talk 18:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.