Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coffee culture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Coffee culture
Article is a corporate vanity page that is lacking any sort of information. Gump Stump 05:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- oppose deletion A re-writing and POV purge is what this article needs. All major companies deserve an article.Adambiswanger1 06:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - misses WP:V and WP:CORP - cannot get any google hits at all. Nothing in the article to suggest notability - Peripitus 06:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Four store company. See also WP:NFT. I am opposed in principle to companies trying to advertise here. --JChap 06:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Ok I just re-wrote the article. It is completely NPOV. Now, I would appreciate it if you re-read it and reconsider your votes. By the way, it has 7 locations, and they seem to be noteworthy by virtue of their striking chicness and modernity amid the rest of New Zealand. Take a look. [1]Adambiswanger1 06:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- unfortunately WP:CORP requires multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or some other external assertion of importance. Simply having many wonderful coffee shops is not enough - Peripitus 09:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Just trying to get people to think about what they're voting on and slow down their Pavlovian disapproval.Adambiswanger1 16:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- unfortunately WP:CORP requires multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or some other external assertion of importance. Simply having many wonderful coffee shops is not enough - Peripitus 09:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Ok I just re-wrote the article. It is completely NPOV. Now, I would appreciate it if you re-read it and reconsider your votes. By the way, it has 7 locations, and they seem to be noteworthy by virtue of their striking chicness and modernity amid the rest of New Zealand. Take a look. [1]Adambiswanger1 06:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Crazynas 12:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Does not assert notability Crazynas 12:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete No substantial notability is asserted. ScottW 12:26, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 13:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per WP:CORP JoJan 17:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete ...wow, WP:CORP has some pretty high standards. Unfortunately, this company doesn't meet them. My heart wants to see it kept, though, so I hope some notability can be proven. If the striking chicness and modernity is what makes it notable, maybe you can find some news articles about the chain. That'd help the case. --UsaSatsui 22:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 05:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.