Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coffee World

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. KrakatoaKatie 10:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coffee World

Coffee World (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

insufficient notability established, as the only sources are the company website and a listing service. - CobaltBlueTony 18:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete a non notable company, No reliable sources. -Icewedge 18:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete lack of notability and poorly sourced.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 19:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC) changed to Keep
  • Strong keep -- poor sources, but apparently notable in its area. [1] mentions it before Starbucks. [2] says that they'll open the second largest number of stores in Thailand (I think) that year. [3] lists it beside Starbucks as an established competitor to a new chain. [4] mentions it as one of several companies coming into the coffee market in India.--SarekOfVulcan 20:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Notable enough. [5] Ichormosquito 04:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep - I have a number of credible sources that I have just been directed to, so I will get to working on this article to improve it later tonight (EST) after I get home. This franchise is part of a much larger firm that manages seven subsidiaries which I will work on as well. I think the tag should be removed to give me a couple days to work on the article.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 16:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per above, particularly SarekOfVulcan. This appears to be a large chain that is as much as a player as Starbucks in very large markets with sources verifying content. --Oakshade 01:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.