Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoffeeAM.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt. - @pple complain 16:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CoffeeAM.com

CoffeeAM.com (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested speedy, then prod. Non-notable company. No sources at all aside from company web site. Information. Google hits are almost all links to site itself, or to coupons for it on other sites. {{unsourced}} and {{verify}} tags are repeatedly removed without comment by original author. The article is a barely-changed copy-and-paste from this page. Appears to be effort to promote the company and nothing more - in other words, spam. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Probably speedily, per G4? The creating editor was informed of the problems and how to fix it in a section at EA, but failed to follow up on it. Adrian M. H. 19:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Speedy was declined by another editor due to an unsubstantiated assertion of the company's market position. The original author has ignored all warnings and simply reverted them out. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
    • It was speedied twice previously [1]. Adrian M. H. 19:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete recreation of deleted vanity/advertising article Collectonian 19:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. as already-speedied spam. If it bobs up again, may need to salt. JohnCD 20:12, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete looks like wiki spam to me. 82.153.19.100 21:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Update: The original author removed the AfD notice from the article, and is now obviously acting in bad faith. The notice has been reverted. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I'm inclined to add my support to a salting of this title if this should be deleted once more, given the history of the article and the editor's actions. Adrian M. H. 00:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Another Update someone once again removed the AfD, though this time hiding behind an anonymous IP. The removal has been reverted. Collectonian 14:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 15:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.