Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cocknubbing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted by Mackensen. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-25 07:53Z

[edit] Cocknubbing

Cocknubbing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Appears to be a neologism. No ghits for it, and no references or sources cited. This may be a possible hoax, as well. sunstar nettalk 12:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Zero Google hits, no assertion of notability, no sources, sole contribution of user. Delete, per WP:V and WP:NFT. -- The Anome 12:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per Nom, and seems liable to be sillyness. → p00rleno (lvl 83) ←ROCKSCRS 13:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per The Anome. Mathmo Talk 13:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete appears to be a hoax. If it were a real slang term it would likely get at least one Google hit, it doesn't. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Neologism with zero cites or sources. Inkpaduta 14:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:NEO. Just prod this kind of crap; don't even bother with afd. Part Deux 14:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable neologism. WMMartin 14:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Per Above. Ramduke — Ramduke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Delete Ive never heard of this word being used at all - always find suspicion when its is deemed a local dialect as I feel this is an easy way to avoid being questioned on why it is not in common usage. If it was that common in the midlands it would have spread to other gay communities in the UK --PrincessBrat 12:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.