Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cock vore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. I'm inclined to redirect to unbirth as the real information is already there, and the rest - the stuff about being forced into one's partners testicles - looks like complete bollocks (no pun intended). However, there's no consensus for that either, so I'll let the furry fandom deal with it. Yeuch. --Sam Blanning(talk) 15:15, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cock vore

Contested PROD, univerified dictionary definition plus original research. See VfD for Unbirth above. Brian G. Crawford 21:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, I'm afraid. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that makes provisions and various policies for endorsal to keep it as proffessional as possible. To attempt to pass off such original claims in dictionary format is outrageous. -ZeroTalk 21:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and mention in paraphilia. Fishhead64 22:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, appears to be a weird, but real, thing. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 23:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge to unbirth or vore. Zetawoof(ζ) 23:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn fringe trivia. --Fire Star 03:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and let someone else figure out a merge. We don't need conflicting AFD merges. Kotepho 03:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. Take a look at these lines (last line in the article) — Though most sessions end similar to unbirth, in which the character is curled up securely and comfortably within the stomach area of their partner, some characters are forced into their partner's testicles, in which their body is broken down through unknown means and transformed into semen used to fuel their partner's own orgasm.. This is clearly a hoax, justifying the article's speedy delete. --Soumyasch 04:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
    • It's an erotic fantasy, not an actual practice. Perhaps the article doesn't make this sufficiently clear. Zetawoof(ζ) 06:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge to unbirth. As someone familiar with this practice, I must specifically note that Soumyasch is incorrect, and this is a fetish on the internet. Specifically, it is a subclass of Unbirth, which is a subclass of Vore. I also point to [1], another Wiki that deals with the matter, for reference. Tialla 06:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per above. --MaNeMeBasat 07:41, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per Tialla.. this exists, but it's definitely niche. Re: Soumyasch's comment, it's obviously not possible in real life! -- Mithent 13:09, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or merge to unbirth, or merge both this and unbirth to vore. I'd stumbled across these before, and wasn't sure what to do with them, though I had merged soft vore into vore. But they have serious WP:V problems that their fans (if there really are) need to address. Шизомби 18:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment I tried looking this up in Google book search, and scholar but no results. A few on blog, including a Monty Python Cheese sketch tranferred into the realm of paraphilia and another that specifically mentions the WP articles on Cock vore and unbirth. And drawings... yergh... There's also mentions on fur.artwork.erotica going back to 2001 (though just a couple), so I guess it's verifiable, it's more a question of notability. Шизомби 01:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete um.....cannot meet Wp:V and NOR. delete ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 23:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.