Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coastal navigation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 00:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coastal navigation

Coastal navigation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I'm fairly certain this article should be deleted - it seems to be an extract from a book, and so may fall under CSD G12 (copyright), failing that it may just be pure gibberish - in the sense of not being a viable WP article in its present form. I'm therefore nominating for deletion CultureDrone (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Reading again, it may actually be a simple case of self advertising for software, but I'll wait for others opinions. CultureDrone (talk) 23:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - when this article first appeared I almost nominated it for CSD but I decided to see what other editors thought. From the creator's user name and the lead section it is some kind of self-promotion. In any case it is certainly not encyclopedic. Also there are no references, hence no verifiability of notability. Sbowers3 (talk) 23:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as obvious advertising by or for the author of the book. DGG (talk) 12:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - appears to be advertising -- Whpq (talk) 19:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per above. --Sharkface217 22:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.