Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coastal Sound Music Academy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 04:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coastal Sound Music Academy

Coastal Sound Music Academy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

this page was speedied, then reduced to a PROD, but I think there should be some discussion and a few more sets of eyes before the decision is made Ardent†alk∈ 12:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep - I think it is noteable actually. Lots of links on search engines. What article content there is is reasonable. Sounds to me as though it is quite a popular academy. Lradrama 13:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The first Google page shows a lot of listings and passing mentions, not feature articles by independent sources. Come up with a few legit references and I'll change my mind. MarkBul 15:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete nn choir that fails either WP:MUSIC or WP:ORG, take your pick. Eusebeus 15:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Eusebeus. GreenJoe 18:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless significant coverage from reliable, independent sources are found Corpx 00:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Comment: It looks like consensus is leaning towards deletion, as a note to the admin that closes the debate, the article Sing Me A Song should follow quickly on its heels as a speedy deletion under section 1.2 article 7 Ardent†alk∈ 03:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Additionally the admin who closes this debate as delete should speedy delete the fair use image associated with this (and only this) article at Image:CSMA_logo.jpg under item 5 of section 1.4 of the policy. Ardent†alk∈ 06:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as utterly lacking sources supporting the assertion that the subject is world famous. --ElKevbo 03:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.