The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete (blatant copyright infringement). --Pablo D. Flores(Talk) 14:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
It's promotional material and much of the content seems to be ripped from this page. I don't see how this article can be considered encyclopedic.Reyk 10:44, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete, very unencyclopedic form, nothing to be salvaged here, IMO. Pavel Vozenilek 11:07, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Speedy, copyvio. --Thephotoman 14:05, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.