Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cmyblogs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Sr13 03:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cmyblogs

Cmyblogs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable blog platform. Turns up relatively few GHits for a supposedly notable blog platform -- reads somewhat spammily (is that a word?) too. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 18:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I am adding two similar articles, which were written by the same author, and whose subject belongs to the same corporate entity.

Cmyos (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Cmystudios (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Shalom ^Hello 20:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per lack of significant coverage from independent sources - None mentioned and I couldn't find any myself Corpx 02:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, I have added the DMOZ reference as a credible indipendent source. I believe that this article is a valuable resource for people and enhances their knowledge and understanding of this blogging platform.
  • You have put this AfD tag on the article and it is an article that I wrote, so I would like to know how to improve the article to close this AfD discussion. This will help ensure this article and other articles that I edit and write in the future remain as valueable resources for people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxeboy (talk • contribs)

• You need reliable sources that verify Cmyblogs' notability. Just saying that it exists isn't enough.

• Forums/directory listings etc dont count as reliable sources. You must have "significant coverage" from independent reliable sources to be notable Corpx 19:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, I think DMOZ is quite a reputable source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WillF (talk • contribs)

• Not according to WP:RS it's not. DMOZ is a directory. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 02:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete no reliable third party sources - dmoz submissions are only barely less open than the wiki itself, and nothing else is mentioned in the article. Substantial cleanup required if real sources do arise - References are out of place and "runs in the browser" makes it sound more like Pyro than a web application. MrZaius^talk 17:56, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 17:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete G11 - spam Will ^(talk) 18:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, They actually break the GPL license and are in copiright violations with eyeOS Open Source Project.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.