Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cluster Missiles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 07:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cluster Missiles

Delete. A small paragraph article about a special weapon from a star wars game. Merge is sort of out of the option, because of the name of the article and the fact that the article would probably only mention it briefly in a gameplay section. — Deckiller 00:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Madchen Hoch 00:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --teh tennisman Speak your piece!People person!FREE STUFF CLICK HERE 00:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable Star Wars fancruft. --Tarret 01:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Wikipedia is not a game guide. MER-C 02:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Per Mer-C.--Seadog.M.S 12:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, I can see how it is relevant to the games, but it doesn't deserve an article of it's own, probably should be included in an article covering all the weaponry (even if that should exist). James086 Talk | Contribs 12:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Star Wars Expanded Universe. --Ineffable3000 22:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
    • That merge would make absolutely no sense, since this is a minor special attack from a video game, whereas the EU article provides a broad overview of the multimedia and whatnot...— Deckiller 11:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with List of Star Wars ship-mounted weapons. Not worth its own article, but since we have an appropriate list, we might as well merge it. BryanG(talk) 01:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
    • IMO, that would encourage gameguide-cruft, which really doesn't have a significance outisde of the game itself. — Deckiller 11:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.