Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cluck-U Chicken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Wizardman 13:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cluck-U Chicken

Cluck-U Chicken (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Self-promotion. Seraphim Whipp 11:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• Um not actually self-promotion, was written by User:Crazyswordsman, but of questionable merit nonetheless. Guy (Help!) 11:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Article on legitimate restaurant-chain. Recommend article be tagged for {{cleanup}}. Aarktica 13:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. It is unknown whether User:Crazyswordsman works for the company. It does seem like advertising of some sort, suggesting a relationship between the article's creator and the company. Seraphim Whipp 13:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. Point well taken. The concern I had was that an article on a legitmate subject is being throttled because it might have been written by a shill. It might be more productive to tag the article {{NPOV}}, instead of deleting it. Aarktica 19:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, any restaurant chain with 37 locations is obviously notable. Andrew Levine 01:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Where does it say there are 37 locations? Is it verifiable? Seraphim Whipp 09:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• [1] -- there, and I can vouch for at least four of the Jersey locations I've seen, not that there's any real reason for them to lie on their own promotional website about where their locations are. Andrew Levine 16:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Cool. I'm a brit so I'd never heard of this chain and was under the impression it was some sort of university eat-out. As a result, I hadn't checked out the website. Seraphim Whipp 17:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

  Keep I'm an american and I've never seen the Queen... guess she doesnt exist.... oh wait. BZZT You win the dumbass of the day award. Google... its your friend.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 04:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. That was an unnecessary comment. You make yourself look foolish. Seraphim Whipp 12:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep per above. - grubber 01:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Alkivar could have put it a bit more softly, but I am still rather put off at how carelessly this nomination was made. Yamaguchi先生 02:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.