Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloudmir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cloudmir

Cloudmir (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)
  • Delete - seems non-notable, mostly a repeated sight gag. Has been tagged as unsourced since July 2006. Otto4711 01:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. Most likely it's an attempt by producers to avoid plugging a specific brand name during their television series. Perhaps worthy of a passing mention on Arrested Development, but not of its own article. Flakeloaf 01:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No attempt to comply with our WP:N or WP:V policies. No assertion of notability independent of the television show in which this item appears. No sources. --Shirahadasha 02:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable outside the TV series. Sorry. Lankiveil 04:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete for all the reasons previously stated. House of Scandal 08:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as trivia -- Whpq 15:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete So many fictional beverages lately. As trivial as they are, they may at least have some kind of home at List_of_Fictional_Beverages. Having a separate article for each is clearly unjustified. Does some of this tread into "original research" territory?zadignose 17:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. —dima/s-ko/ 20:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I see no reason to delete. The show has created its own culture and Cloudmir is a notable part of it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 38.100.16.194 (talk) 21:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.