Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloud 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete as blatant advertising for a nn company. - ulayiti (talk) 13:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cloud 7

Non-notable according to WP:CORP. Vanity page. See also here, here and here. Grover cleveland

(afd page format corrected, no vote MartinRe 20:48, 14 May 2006 (UTC))

• Delete. Nice pic but this is blatant advertising. -- RHaworth 10:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 19:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and Rewrite. I think it could be made NPOV with a little work. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 19:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Even if this is true, it wouldn't fix the problem that this corporation is non-notable according to WP:CORP. Grover cleveland 08:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

It's too bad, I think. I can find one review of the clothing line online. The name of the clothing line is unfortunate, too, as most of the references that come up when searching refer to the weather or people being on "cloud 9". ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 02:12, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Satoshi Matsuzawa is a notable graphic artist (mangaka?) though.. --Kunzite 23:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per WP:CORP. Stifle (talk) 15:34, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not meeting WP:CORP trumps fixing any NPOV. Vegaswikian 18:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.