Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Closedown

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY DEL

[edit] Closedown

I'm not as familiar with the "This article is actively undergoing a major edit" tag as I probably should be so I left a note on the talk page indicating that I'd be putting it up for vfd. It had been sitting like this for 3 days, which seems like enough time for someone to make something of it if they intended to (especially after "locking" it in this manner). Considering the content I think deleteing it would be appropriate for now and if someone would like to make something of it later they can. Rx StrangeLove 02:49, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete under CSD criterion G2. Uncle G 03:08, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)
• Yup, definitely a Speedy candidate. Even though this article is on VfD, is it okay to slap a CSD notice on it? android↔talk 03:47, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
• speedeleted. content was OMG BillyH is writing this article! {{inuse}}. Mikkalai 04:42, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.