Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 02:04, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cloka

Game cruft/neologism/sub-slang Pete.Hurd 00:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

  • recommend delete (note IP's colourful history User_talk:66.210.38.254) Pete.Hurd 00:28, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • "Cloka" is a typo for "cloak"; [weak] redirect to cloak, as clearly at least one person made the mistake. — Haeleth Talk 00:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
    • The Google test reveals that Mgm is right and this isn't as common a typo as I thought it might be. I'd still tend to keep the redirect, because I understand they're cheap, but let me note here that I shan't be at all bothered if the vote goes to "delete" instead. — Haeleth Talk 13:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to cloak. Carioca 01:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Cloak --06:32, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, I don't think redirecting for this specific typo is useful. What next? Apple to appel, green to grene, just because one person couldn't spell? This isn't due to a common typo or some misunderstood grammar or spelling rule. - Mgm|(talk) 10:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per MacGyverMagic. — JIP | Talk 12:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete sub-trivial and with no potential to expand. Oh, alright, redirect to Halo (and then burn that as gamecruft). Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 14:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - wikipedia isn't a dictionary and even less a urban dictionary --Mecanismo 22:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.