Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloffs dairy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as recreation of previously deleted content. Capitalistroadster 04:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cloffs dairy

Poorly formatted, nn store, advertising SM247 01:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

It's reposted content of articles that were previously deleted. -Fsotrain09 01:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Do you have links to the previous deletions? DVD+ R/W 01:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete per above. Looks like a hoax too; picture is an awful Photoshop job. Danny Lilithborne 01:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Is this some sort of joke? Perhaps BJAODN? DarthVader 01:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

The user that created the page has a history. User:Motorox2 is suspected of being a sock puppet of User:AppleJuicefromConcentrate, who's discussion page [1] shows that this is a repost of patent nonsense that's previously been deleted, see Cluff of a bird Dairy Products, Clauth of a bird dairy products. --MZMcBride 01:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Also Clufth of a bird dairy products, Cluth of a bird dairy products...not to mention User:Claught of a bird. -- Scientizzle 03:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Naconkantari 01:45, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom, the letters on the barn of the photo are quite blatently photoshopped, something obviously not right here.--Andeh 01:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete per the concise history provided by MZMcBride. I would only add that User:Motorox came in between User:AppleJuicefromConcentrate and User:Motorox2. They have all posted and defended this content. If this is a joke, its forcefully promoted. -Fsotrain09 01:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete per above. --Bill (who is cool!) 01:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment open up the photograph in wordpad for further evidence that it's been edited in photoshop.--Andeh 02:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete This thing is getting close to the Carlow Crab in its ability to keep reappearing under different names. Fan1967 02:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete It is a hoax, i am almost positive. Also, even if you assume good faith, its NN.  Heltec  talk 
• Speedy Delete multiple repostings of this hoax. Obviously doctored picture. Protect the page after deletion, too. -- Scientizzle 03:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Protection won't help. The previous ones are protected. He changes the spelling every time. However, maybe admins should stop playing with temporary bans on the user. Fan1967 03:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete in lieu of recent posts here and hopefully banish the idiot who keeps posting it. SM247 03:16, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax, nonsense. --Terence Ong 04:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.