Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clock of birds

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 21:37, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Clock of birds

Google's only heard of it in one place: a book called A sideways look at time, and then only in passing in a negitive review. BTW, search was "clock of birds" Kalui, and it thinks Kalui is a spelling error. I don't think this is documented. humblefool® 00:37, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Keep -- unless proven te be unverifiable. It's obscure, interesting trivia that make places like WP worth the visit. - Longhair | Talk 05:20, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I'm afraid you have it exactly backward. The rule has to be delete unless verified. Rossami (talk) 17:58, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• 'keep trusting longhair Yuckfoo 16:43, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - The fact that the Kalui use birds to tell time is interesting and encyclopedic, but it should be noted in an article about the Kalui, not in it's own article. Also, the phrase "clock of birds" is probably just one persons figurative description, not a common expression. —Teknic^{Talk / Mail} 05:59, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. unverifiable. Megan1967 06:11, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete XmarkX 06:14, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete found another reference to it, though also from the author of the book mentioned above. If anything, should get a brief mention in a Kalui article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:47, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.