Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CliqueBlogs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 02:54, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CliqueBlogs

WP:WEB WP:VAIN Self promotion of non-notable web site. John Nagle 05:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. 13 hits in Google including the site itself. --John Nagle 05:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep at least for now. This article is not even a day old, so I think he needs some time to fix it up to make it look like an encyclopedia article. Also, Echidna Enclave exists, so why can't this? --real_decimic 06:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I appreciate the effort put into the article, but the website is not notable enough, yet. I suppose it could be userfied if it isn't considered overly promotional. On this article, I am confident in my decision and don't think more time will help. However, in general, I'm reluctant to wait a while and renominate, since many people seem to reflexively recommend keep after the first nomination fails. -- Kjkolb 07:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. "Better than wikipedia's worst article" is not a criteria for retention. -- GWO

  Comment Requested deletion of Echidna Enclave, per above. --John Nagle 16:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete NN site —Mets501^talk 07:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; if and when it's successful and noteworthy we can include it, but not until then. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn website, vanity. --Terence Ong 11:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as it's currently nn. --Ginkgo100 ^{talk ʘ contribs} 21:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - CliqueBlogs isn't notable enough yet, and it may be added on in the future when it becomes more notable. --real_decimic 04:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. --Nlu (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. - CliqueBlogs is hardly notable. I know the owner and I too think it's too small of a service to be on Wikipedia. --adamb10 - June 11th 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.