Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clintonym

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 21:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Clintonym

• del neologism that failed to be grafted to the American language. mikka (t) 07:07, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Also POV, since Clinton is neither the first nor the last politician to use this form of deceptive language. Jamie 07:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - it kind of smells like a copyvio too but it seems it'll be gone in a few days in any case... (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. not only a nn neologism but possibly copyvio as well — Falerin^{<talk>,<contrib>} 14:52, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable neologism. DeathThoreau 19:03, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Not only bad taste, but an "onym" suffix denotes a method of naming (e.g. matronym) and not a figure of speech (e.g. ellipsis) Harvestman 22:24, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Non-notable neologism. Kingfox 21:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.