Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clint Grill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by User:Inter. Ty 02:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Clint Grill

Clint Grill (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

don't see how he is notable – ThatWikiGuy (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete. No assertion of notability. Rnb (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • A7 Absolutely no assertation of notability. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: An article with "he excelled in photography" can't be claimed to have failed to assert notability, taking this out of speedy. However, there are no sources, and the subject completely fails WP:BIO.  RGTraynor  20:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't think it's difficult to excel in anything when it's in the context of experiences in classes in high school, so I stand by the speedy delete, but either way, the outcome of this discussion will probably be the same. Rnb (talk) 20:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Just saying someone excelled at something isn't enough for A7 not to apply. Completely non-notable, no sources, no assertion of notability. Wildthing61476 (talk) 20:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Entry on the talk page leads me to believe the creator is the person himself, thus is against WP:NPOV. HalfShadow 20:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 02:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. I see that User:ThatWikiGuy removed TenPoundHammer's speedy A7 tag, so I'm not going to tag it again or speedy it myself, but I feel it deserves it — I'm not seeing any assertion of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Absolutely no assertion of notability, and very few ghits. — Wenli (reply here) 02:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.