Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemson vs. Virginia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Clemson vs. Virginia

Not sufficiently notable, Unsourced POV. Delete BlueValour 23:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

• delete not notable schoolfootballteamcruft. Viridae^Talk 23:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as entirely WP:NN. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.Alphachimp ^talk 00:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is an article about one game in '92 that does not merit inclusion. Even if it was about a rivalry (which are sometimes notable enough for us), the one between these two schools is nowhere nearly important enough. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 01:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep (creator) Open your eyes. Do you guys know anything about college football? On the other hand, though I am an expert, I look at it in a higher light than you. College football is a very fun, entertaining, and engaging sport, and so are comebacks. A 28 point comeback is freaking out-of-the-world in amazingness. How many 28 point comebacks have you seen? After watching hundreds of college football games, I haven't seen any, proving the claim that a 28 point comeback is both rare and notable. This was the largest comeback in ACC history, which is notable since there have been 10,000+ ACC games played. Honestly, think logically, and please stop putting articles like this for deletion.--Summonmaster13 05:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Freaking out-of-the-world in college-football-cruftiness. -- GWO
• Delete. I'm not fond of the term "cruft", but this is it. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 22:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep (creator) It's funny how those who voted to delete it, can't say one reason why.--Summonmaster13 04:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: "Not notable" is a perfectly good reason to delete. "Unsourced POV" is reason to delete unless sourced NPOV can be found. On the other hand, you have voted twice to Keep without giving a reason. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 04:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.