Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleaning validation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Addhoc (talk) 00:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cleaning validation

Cleaning validation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

no independent sources to indicate this individual meets the notability requirements Oo7565 (talk) 18:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment This "individual"? Did you read the article? In any case, it seems like there is a good deal to say about this topic [1], but this is totally beyond my area of expertise, so I can't do much with the article myself. Zagalejo^^^ 18:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, suggest speedy keep since this nomination seems to be misfiled. The aticle appears to be about a process used in the manufacture or compounding of drugs, and as such suggests an article that could be validly expanded. Zagalejo's evidence would seem to confirm that it isn't a neologism. Not about a person. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. Notable subject (there are classes that teach it), and certainly not an "individual". Zetawoof(ζ) 21:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep as nominator hasn't followed the relevant section of the Guide to deletion: "You must look for, and demonstrate that you couldn't find, any independent sources of sufficient depth." As Zagalejo has demonstrated, Cleaning Val (as she's known to her friends) is a notable individual who has taken on an unglamorous but vital role in the pharmaceutical industry. Qwfp (talk) 00:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - nominator's other nominations should be examined and likely removed - David Gerard (talk) 13:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.