Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleaning the Spoon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to list of sexual positions. --Gareth Hughes 13:00, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cleaning the Spoon

Article is verbatim text from what is already covered under List of sex positions. Same editor also posting Bagging the bunny and other sex positions as separate articles. vote REDIRECT back to original list. Gaff ^{talk 01:39, 16 October 2005 (UTC)}

• Delete This is at least the second time that this has come back after being deleted. Let original judgment stand. - Gator1 01:41, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Comment Gator: I see you listed Bagging the bunny for a speedy delete. I propose that both artilces be kept with redirects back to the list of sexual positions. These terms may potentially be entries into search engines and it would be better for the information to be accessible than not. The lits of sexual positions site seems the obvious place for this information to be collected.--Gaff ^{talk 01:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)}

• Delete & redirect to List of sexual positions as per Gaff --Anetode 02:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of sexual positions or Anal-oral contact. --Icarus 04:24, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete with no redirect as it is a neologism not in wide use. It might even be made up, there's no relevant Google hits that I could find and it would be unlikely to be use such a term since it is limited to the first time. -- Kjkolb 07:47, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

*Agreed. The first time I put this up I only briefly read the content. Sounds like a neologism or at best slang that is in limited use. delete.--Gaff ^{talk 07:57, 16 October 2005 (UTC)}

• Redirect is probably the best thing. This stuff will just keep coming back if we delete it. --Gaff ^{talk 07:58, 16 October 2005 (UTC)}

• BTW, Bagging the bunny was similarly created as an article from the list of sexual positions. It has been deleted spedily (proposed by Gator and deleted by User:R. fiend. If we decide that Cleaning the spoon is a redirect back to the list, then Bagging the bunny probably needs to go the same. Given that this is apparently a contentious issue that has some controversy surrounding it, Bagging the bunny probably should not have been speedied. --Gaff ^{talk 21:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)}

• Redirect to the list, so people typing this in will find the list. Only delete if the original content that was deleted earlier wasn't merged into the list (which disallows deletion because GFDL requires attribution). In fact, just redirect to be on the safe side. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:07, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect - think many of these sex positions are fairly obscure, and probably only practised as exoticisms. --MacRusgail 19:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: redirecting would preserve the content, which is currently unverified by even the most disreputable source and is possibly unverifiable. Someone likely made this and bagging the bunny up and including it without proof makes us look foolish. -- Kjkolb 10:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge without redirect (Delete) and include in Sexual_slang#Anal_intercourse. -Andrew 18:03, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.