Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classified: The Sentinel Crisis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure), as per consensus. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Classified: The Sentinel Crisis

Classified: The Sentinel Crisis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable computer game Phiwum (talk) 14:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Keep - According to the wikipedia general notability guideline, the way you prove notability is with reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The article has a review from IGN and a review from GameSpot. Both sites are reliable sources, and both are independent of the game developer and its business partners. Perhaps the nominator did not see the references? I know they're not in the format that I'm used to either. Randomran (talk) 16:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep: Seems notable, I'd be willing to keep it for a while...... Dendodge .. Talk^Help 17:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
• Strong keep. Notability already established in the article. Beyond that, no reason provided for deletion or explanation of why those references don't constitute nontrivial mention in RS. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 01:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I've updated the article with an infobox (Template:Infobox VG), coverart, and I've properly referenced the reception section and the infobox. Should assert notability. -- Nomader ^(Talk) 05:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - Notability has been asserted through third-party reliable sources and article has been cleaned up.Gazimoff ^Write_Read 16:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - adequate coverage present to meet WP:N; IGN and GameSpot are certainly independent reliable sources that can provide notability. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 09:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy keep Notability was established before AFD commenced - two separate full reviews from established reliable sources. Someoneanother 16:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.