Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic Vacations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep – Gurch 12:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Classic Vacations

This is probably big enough to be notable, but some people might think otherwise. -TruthbringerToronto 23:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Classic Vacations is a subsidiary of Expedia Inc and deserves a page just as the like of other Expedia sub-companies such as Hotels.com and TripAdvisor.
- sthakkar 23:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Alexa ranking of hotels.com: 768. Ranking of TripAdvisor.com: 323. Ranking of this thing: > 40,000. Come here when notable, not to get notable. --DaveG12345 01:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC) (see below)
• Delete as copyvio [1].--Allen 03:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Not a copyvio any longer (unless somebody reverts my edits). --TruthbringerToronto 03:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Keep for now. Thanks for removing the copyvio. DaveG12345, Classic Vacations seems to be more of a traditional travel agency than a website (despite having been bought by Expedia), so I'm not sure Alexa rankings are a fair guide here. --Allen 03:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep OK, I will trust your judgment on that, not having heard of them myself. --DaveG12345 04:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. It seems like a noteworthy tour operator. I don't know where one would find statistics on its market share in the package tour areas where it operates. --TruthbringerToronto 03:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.