Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic Tales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. JIP | Talk 06:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Classic Tales

Consested {{prod}} brought here for consensus. RobertG ♬ talk 09:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete not notable. No Alexa ranking for external link. Can someone suggest a sensible redirect? Or perhaps someone might volunteer to convert it to a disambig page? --RobertG ♬ talk 09:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Removed external link, does this make it acceptable? People will already know how to access the website. —This unsigned comment was added by Kkrogstad (talk • contribs) .

• • Needs to meet notability guidelines at WP:WEB. NickelShoe (Talk) 21:43, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Updated

• Removed links to website and other web content. Entry now just includes the literature. Should now be acceptable per WP:WEB. —This unsigned comment was added by 24.118.134.37 (talk • contribs) .

• Delete as per RobertG. Removal of weblinks only makes articles more unacceptable. Green Giant 02:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.