The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 02:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Two separate potential dicdefs but no worthwhile content. Orphan and deadend page. Delete Supergolden 16:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete This is a dictdef page rather than a disambiguation page. They are poor definitions of the terms, too. -- (aeropagitica) 17:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete but not as neologisms. OED gives a 1957 reference for Like the clappersDlyons493Talk 00:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete as unencyclopedic. Stifle 17:23, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.