Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clairgustance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 18:17, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Clairgustance

Non-notable dicytionary definition already transwikied. Delete. Physchim62 17:36, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

  • IRL, I'm a food chemist, with a fair amount of experience in sensory science, I.e taste testing and as such I can generally guess what any given thing will taste like with good accuracy.Klonimus 06:03, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
    • Not credible, hearsay. Unless we send a science team to Klonimus's house to verify :) Radiant_* 09:15, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
      • Will the verification process include dissection? (grin) Barno 17:11, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge with ESP. Radiant_* 09:15, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge/Redirect with ESP, although I'm unclear how this differs from the olfactory sense. *shrug* — RJH 14:48, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
    • Note: with 350 googles, this sounds vaguely neologistic. Radiant_* 17:49, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
      • Quite possibly. It's easy to combine the prefixes "clair-" or "tele-", or the suffix "-kinesis", with a Latin- or Greek-sounding root to get a new paranormal ability. --Carnildo 06:31, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge with ESP or delete as a neologism. --Carnildo 06:32, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Clairsentience and clairaudience have their own articles (albeit stubs), and this falls along the same line. —Markaci 2005-05-21 T 16:24 Z
  • Keep--Tznkai 18:02, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.