Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Coullon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (sigh). DS 12:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Claire Coullon

Apparently nonnotable graphic designer. Only two relevant Google hits, both pages of a degree program at Leeds Metropolitan University, suggesting that she is perhaps a student. Zero hits on Google News, Google Books, or Google Scholar. I'd have tagged this for speedy, save that the mention of a museum's purchasing one of her works might be taken as an assertion of notability. Deor 00:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• Her work, if significant, could merit it... newspapers someone?JJJ999 00:34, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete almost a speedy, and the one slim claim of notability doesn't appear to be verifiable (no Google web, books, or news hits for "Claire Coullon" +Contradiction, or "Claire Coullon" +Tate for that matter). Indeed, the only relevant hit for the name at all is a single photo on a site of some student art course, and it's anybody's guess if that's even the same person. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Gakusha 00:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete was going to nominate it in a couple of days. A contemporary artist whose work is bought by the Tate Modern probably deserves an article. Except that claim is pretty dubious. Pascal.Tesson 00:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. non-notable. Renee 01:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm coming up against the same inability to find sources as everybody else, and the creator's other article is starting to look fishy, too. --Groggy Dice T | C 02:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, borderline speedy, not notable. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete NN, unreferenced... Iamchrisryan 10:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Also, author might be a hoaxer. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 21:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete it is obviously a hoax of the creator (2 articles) :) Elmao 05:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 07:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.