The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 16:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Contested prod for a non notable nelogism that manages 10 GHIts, including Wiki sites and totally unrelated uses. Nuttah68 13:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom. And while that's not a persuasive argument, everything else I'm saying is total fluff. S/he's right. :) --Moonriddengirl(talk) 20:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.