Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City of Shoulders and Noses

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 00:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] City of Shoulders and Noses

City of Shoulders and Noses (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This one has been prodded...3 times, at last count. I think that's good evidence it belongs at AFD. Procedural nom. UsaSatsui 17:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, nonnotable unproduced screenplay, violates WP:CRYSTAL. NawlinWiki 17:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Google shows no evidence of notability for this one. No prejudice against recreation if it's actually turned into a notable movie some day. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as it is not yet notable -- with only 8 Ghits [1], 2 from WP, none of which are independent, and none of which verify that it is actually in production. No IMdB page, either. Future movie or play not ready for its own article. Bearian 19:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Films that are not even in production yet don't come close to meeting WP:MOVIE, but I'm delighted to know that Sybil Danning is still getting work, even though shoulders and noses are not the body parts for which she's best known. Accounting4Taste 22:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. When it moves from being a screenplay to a film in production, then an article will be appropriate. Also note that the Tommy Ardolino page has also been deleted [2]. Shawn in Montreal 01:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per others. Non-notable at the moment. Doctorfluffy 01:41, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Three prods? Delete per nom and above. —ScouterSig 16:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.